Aidan Mayo vs Tyler Zink Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the players' second serve performance in the last six months reveals that Mayo has a slight edge, winning 46.82% of points compared to Zink's 44.89%. This statistic has shown a high correlation with predicting match outcomes. In terms of return game statistics, Mayo has been effective, winning 46.42% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Zink trails behind with 41.81%. However, Zink has a slight advantage in returning first serves, achieving a 26.53% win rate compared to Mayo's 25.51%.

Looking at how they perform under pressure, Mayo has managed to save 55.83% of break points, outpacing Zink, who has saved 53.21%. This difference can be crucial for live betting predictions. Over the past year, their overall match win percentages show that Zink has had a more successful run, with a 69.49% win rate (41 wins, 18 losses) compared to Mayo's 49.12% (28 wins, 29 losses).

Examing surface preferences, Mayo fares best on hard courts with a career win percentage of 57% (77 wins, 59 losses), while Zink's optimal performance is on indoor hard courts with a 62% win rate (16 wins, 10 losses). Conversely, Mayo struggles on clay courts, having won only 42% of their matches (13 wins, 18 losses), while Zink's least favorable surface seems to be hard courts, still managing a 54% win rate (38 wins, 33 losses).

When considering the level of tournaments played, Mayo has mainly competed in Challengers and ITF tournaments worth over $10K, achieving a 50.94% win rate. In contrast, Zink has mostly participated in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments around $10K, with a stronger win rate of 75.56%. The level of events contested is crucial when analyzing their statistics relative to their competition.

In their direct head-to-head encounters, Zink has consistently emerged victorious, winning the only match they've played. The match concluded in straight sets, with Zink taking the win 6-3, 6-4 at the Cleveland Challenger. Historically, their matches against each other average a duration of 1 hour, 11 minutes, and 54 seconds, without any deciding sets or tie-breaks.

In terms of opponent quality, Mayo has faced tougher competition, playing against opponents with an average rank of 284.61, compared to Zink's 430.05. This information is vital for contextualizing their performance statistics. If this match were to go the distance into a deciding set, Mayo has won 45% of such encounters in the past year, while Zink has fared better with a 76% win rate.

Returning to the topic of break point conversion, Mayo appears more proficient, having converted 34.33% of opportunities, whereas Zink has managed to convert only 25.81%. This statistic could be decisive during critical moments within the match. Based on the current data and trends, Zink seems to hold a slight overall advantage and is favored to win the upcoming match against Mayo.